Taxing your e-mail is another method of snooping or controlling your thinking or speech.
From the Gospel of John 7-38 "He that believeth on me, as the scripture has said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water". I am painting water and I will paint this picture of the water as a reminder of precious Scriptures. Christ is the living waters of our lives.
My friend shared with me that he has 2 son-in-laws not worth a cuss. It seems the law of average would be not more than one per man, that's the way the ball bounces sometimes.
Continued from my last journal on the dangers of vaccinations and all the brainwashing.
"such as mercury that may cause brain damage". These are people that will fight long and hard to protect their golden eggs and harvest all their investment in their political system. While there is good reason to be hopeful that the truth is finally coming out against forced vaccinations, they continue to beat around the b-u-s-h and protect their med investments.
There is also evidence of cover up and silencing of the voices that tell the miserable truth. They're actually investing it all on vaccinations and are not about to admit to their wrong.
As soon as they report such facts the information then seems to automatically disappear.
The
5% fraternal membership of
And after NAFTA? "When promises of pork are made to congressmen to change their
votes, is this not bribery? Isn't the use of positive/negative reinforcement
operant condition ing (rewards and punishment)
basically what the Russian Ivan Pavlov and the American B. F. Skinner
recommended as the method to change animal behavior and to create robots? The
above is quoted from an article by Charlotte Iserbyt
that appeared in the <newswith views.com> the
day after the House vote on the CAFTA Trade Agreement. She followed this up with some pretty hard
charges against those congressman who voted yes for Cafta. In case you are one who has not heard of Cafta and don't know what the acronym stands for, CAFTA
stands for Central American Free Trade Agreement. Actually, it means some thing more like
citizens for the ASHHEAP. An email that
I received shortly after the cafta vote stated that a
poll taken before the vote showed 96 percent of those polled were all against Cafta, yet the House voted 217 yes to 215 no with 2 not
voting. If these voters are suppose to
represent the citizens who elected them, why did they not have a 96% NO vote?
Perhaps it is because those elected officials have learned that the
constituents who voted them into office will not vote them out even if they
decide to give the country away, which it seems they have done. In voting for Cafta
they have once more ceded national sovereignty to some non-elected group who
will be dictating trade policies of the
This nation is on a roller coaster ride to destruction and we're getting there very quickly.
There
is certainly no common sense in
I am now ready to paint the red ball, a bloody earth with blood on his hands, the lunatic.
With
forest fires raging out West and the National Guard who usually fights the
fires are now in